: Historical Section, ComNavEu. "Administrative History of U.S. Naval Forces
in Europe, 1940-1946." vol. 5. (London, 1946) [This manuscript, identified as
Indexed at the U.S. Naval War College, Newport, R.I., in connection with the preparation of
S.E. Morison's
Volume XI,
by Roger F. Schofield, YN1, USN, 9 December 1954.
: Many page references are to the text of the footnotes,
which have been moved to the end of the chapters in this online version. Be sure to check
those, as well as the page text, when following the references.]
| ABC Conference, concept of Allied War Aims |
4 |
| |
-1 Agreement, of 27 March 1941 |
58 |
| Accommodations for landing craft crews |
578-580 |
| ACCUMULATOR, briefly discussed |
484 |
| AEAF Command, and brief discussion |
455 |
| Air bombardment failure to materialize at OMAHA |
518 |
| Air Corridor, suggested by AEAF to Adm Ramsay |
388 |
| |
restricted air attack on enemy forces in area |
389 |
| Air Forces, AEF, available in UK for support of NEPTUNE |
289 |
| |
available airlift for airborne troops |
290 |
| Air-Navy coordination of bombardment |
458 |
| |
Broad outline of Joint Fire Plan |
459 |
| |
Air bombardment plan |
462 |
| |
AF delayed furnishing Navy with details on fighter protection,
routing, air bombardment program |
388 |
| |
Adm Ramsay agrees to restrict AA fire with certain provisions |
388 |
| |
AF being shot down over SWORD beach -- first mention |
388 |
| |
Operations outline plan for COSSAC |
120 |
| |
Target priority |
120 |
| |
Bombing of civilian population |
125 |
| |
Protection of Invasion Forces |
454 |
| |
Use of Allied fighters |
455 |
| |
Spot, brief description, organization, technique, etc. |
471 |
| |
Observation Post, Army |
473 |
| |
Strength in comparison, German and Russian |
37 |
| |
Available for operations against the NEPTUNE forces (German) |
454 |
| |
Analysis of the various beaches and ability for air support of troops |
257 |
| |
Support of NEPTUNE Forces |
454 |
| ALERT, Anti-human torpedo operation, Human torpedoes |
322 |
| Allied Air Offensive, carried out on D-day in two phases |
280 |
| |
and other air targets on D-day |
281 |
| American Planning Staff views presented to British COS 1942 |
11 |
| Ammunition, methods of supply |
473 |
| Amphibious Attack, method for NEPTUNE |
263 |
| |
Broad plan for initial campaign |
263 |
| ANCXF, discussion of command regarding Gen Devers suggestion
of two distinct Naval Commands in OVERLORD |
195 |
| |
Excerpt on status of ANCXF by Admiralty publication |
197 |
| |
Cominch defined operation control |
200 |
| |
Designation of Adm Ramsay as |
209 |
| |
Proposed division of responsibility among the major authorities |
213 |
| |
Forces under operational command during NEPTUNE |
217 |
| |
Matters of concern in concert with 21 Army Group |
228 |
| |
Estimation of German naval forces |
246 |
| |
Unacceptable recommendation from NCWTF for pre D-day bombardment of Cherbourg |
383 |
| |
Issued Op-Order 24 April |
384 |
| |
Method employed in writing orders |
385 |
| |
Freeze further alteration of orders |
386 |
| |
Accepts AF routing plan over beaches over NCWTF objections |
389 |
| |
Transport for Army Air Spotters, cubs, etc. |
389 |
| ANCXF, organized COTUG on 24 May to deal with tug problem |
391 |
| |
VIPs visiting |
391 |
| |
Signals H-hour for forces |
393 |
| |
Meetings held to examine weather forecasts |
393 |
| |
Signal for postponement promulgated 0515 |
395 |
| |
Forces allotted to CinC Plymouth for CORK |
418 |
| |
CinC Portsmouth responsible for operating forces on
western flank of SPOUT |
422 |
| |
Assigned screening responsibility to force commanders, Home
commands--convoys; force commanders--assault area |
425 |
| |
Retained direct control for minesweeping in ten initial channels |
435 |
| Anglo-American basic plan regarding relations |
344 |
| |
Adm Stark informs Cominch of support by British |
345 |
| |
Naval Operations discussed |
344 |
| ANVIL, Gen Eisenhower's report on |
102 |
| APPROACH, definition and brief discussion |
438 |
| |
Troubles of minesweepers |
440 |
| ARCADIA Conference, 3 broad strategic plans for conduct of War |
5 |
| |
Decision to concentrate on defeat of Germany |
9 |
| |
Main points to be emphasized by PM to Americans |
54 |
| Army Forces, AEF, operationally available land forces for NEPTUNE |
287 |
| |
Group D, military force assigned Von Rundstedt to defend West |
233 |
| Assault, situation at the end of the first 24 hours |
559 |
| |
and Follow-Up loaded and assembled (British) |
375 |
| |
Brief description of duties of various units during assault |
282 |
| |
Objectives once armies were ashore |
283 |
| Barbed wire, German use of, in defense |
238 |
| Barker, Brig Gen R.W., Head of U.S. Section of COSSAC |
87 |
| Batteries, location of enemy batteries |
468 |
| Beach Battalions, description of duties |
574 |
| |
Joint conferences regarding |
575 |
| Beaches, amount landed over beaches in the first 30 days |
573 |
| Beach Reconnaissance, brief description |
158 |
| BEAVER, Operation by force "U" 29-31 March |
364 |
| Bell, Commander T.I.S., Chief Principle Beachmaster in "S" |
557 |
| Bennett, RAdm A.G., "Advance Group Amphibious Forces LantFlt" |
339 |
| Bieri, RAdm, planning section ANCXF of SHAEF as Deputy CoS |
387 |
| BIGDRUM, Brief description |
147 |
| |
Composition of force |
319 |
| |
Responsibility of Naval Commander Force "U" |
484 |
| BODYGUARD, brief description with a list of "Stories" |
140 |
| |
Graph showing control of stories |
144 |
| |
Overall results of cover and deceptive operations in graph |
167 |
| BOLERO, Plans of Washington and London committees |
75 |
| |
Troop movements began under BOLERO July 1942 |
75 |
| |
Approved in April 1942 |
61 |
| |
Progress of shipping in table form |
77 |
| |
Duties charged with |
63 |
| Bombardment Force, number of ships forming |
316 |
| |
Objects of |
317 |
| |
Spotting performed by |
317 |
| |
Ships allocated for Bombardment forces |
317-320 |
| |
Navy-Air Coordination |
458 |
| Bombardment objectives |
458-459 |
| |
Principles of bombardment |
459 |
| |
Broad outline of Joint Fire Plan |
459 |
| |
Air Plan |
462 |
| |
Naval plan and objectives |
464 |
| |
Schedule of fire |
468 |
| |
Targets |
469 |
| BOMBARDON, brief description |
326 |
| Bomber Command (RAF) Operations night preceding D-day |
462 |
| BRAVADO, Plan for minelaying Kiel Canal |
413 |
| British Chiefs of Staff, objections to Gen Marshall's 1942 invasion plans |
12 |
| |
Four conditions to be met for a cross Channel attack |
29 |
| |
Strategy and concepts as the war progressed |
25 |
| |
Views on Mediterranean and North African possession |
15 |
| British Joint Planning Staff, set to work by PM
to implement the concepts of War Cabinet May 1940 |
51 |
| Brooke, Sir Alan, invited to inform Russia date of OVERLORD |
46 |
| Bryant, Adm, CTF 124.9 in Force "O" Texas flagship |
467 |
| |
Second in command to Adm Deyo in Bombardment of Cherbourg CTF 129 |
477 |
| BUCCANEER, Reduction of forces in favor of OVERLORD |
106 |
| BUCO, brief description of |
312 |
| |
Build Up Control Organization an inter-service body |
580 |
| Build-up, race depended upon three conditions |
29 |
| |
Primary naval duty of AEF was build up for battle of France |
563 |
| |
Problems of the build up summarized into 3 main tasks |
563 |
| |
Problems not noted or encountered in other amphibious operations |
565 |
| |
Dual control after D-day |
573 |
| |
For offensive land operations |
311 |
| |
Number of ships and craft in operation |
313 |
| |
Brief of plan |
311 |
| |
Methods of transport |
311 |
| |
Objectives sought in Build up plan |
285 |
| |
Facilities planned for Air Forces by certain dates |
285 |
| |
Sailing of all ships and craft were arranged for certain requirements |
286 |
| Bush, Captain, Commenting on crews of landing craft in "S" area |
556 |
| Captain (Patrols) delegated to screen Eastern Assault Area,
title given by NCETF |
426 |
| |
System of defense employed |
426 |
| Cargo-Vehicles, responsibility for loading between USA and USN |
563 |
| Casablanca Conference, British studies formed the basis for
policy on Cross Channel preparations |
79-81 |
| |
Strategy for 1943 |
20 |
| Casualties to naval personnel in Force "O" |
531 |
| |
Among Demolition Units |
531 |
| Chain of Command for the Assault Phase |
191 |
| |
Naval system of Command |
193 |
| |
Twelfth Fleet's position |
204 |
| Chief Naval Administrative Officer (Rivett-Carmac) dealt with
Shore Organization |
565 |
| Chief of Staff Review of situation found for facts (Nov 1943) |
39 |
| |
(British) recommendations on ANVIL and OVERLORD |
113 |
| Chief of Staff (American) point of view effect of Gen Montgomery's
change of OVERLORD Plan |
108 |
| |
Summary of European situation 1 Nov 1943 |
34 |
| Chronology, OVERLORD Naval Command |
222-226 |
| |
D-6 day to D-75, briefly discussed |
332 |
| Coastal Air Operations during the crossing and assault |
324 |
| Coastal Batteries, description of types used |
241 |
| |
Command (RAF) duties of command |
449 |
| |
Command organization |
450 |
| |
Composition of Coastal Command |
451 |
| |
Offensive against Norway based U-boats |
451 |
| |
Operations during invasion |
452 |
| |
Description of enemy's coastwise transport |
453 |
| COCKADE, brief description |
136 |
| Combined Chiefs of Staff, Overall strategy for 1943 |
20 |
| |
Agreement at Arcadia |
10 |
| |
First session January 1942 |
10 |
| |
Casablanca policy determined by two British studies |
79 |
| CinC Plymouth charged with sealing western approaches to Channel
to submarines |
418 |
| |
Organized sea barrier known as CORK |
418 |
| |
Forces allotted for CORK |
418 |
| |
Regarding telephone between Adm Moon and Adm Hall on postponement |
500 |
| Combined Commanders Committee |
52 |
| Cominch, ComNavEu requests base maintenance organization |
345 |
| |
Commo Edgar to Amphibious force |
358 |
| |
Designates Adm Moon to command new force of increased assault |
302 |
| ComLandCrabEu, Brief description |
346 |
| |
Adm Wilkes assigned to duty as |
347 |
| |
Facilities prepared -- types |
349 |
| |
List of bases provided by the British |
349 |
| |
Placing ships in force organization |
356 |
| |
Responsible for executing maintenance. List of units
assigned for task |
367 |
| |
Task to be performed |
346 |
| |
Establishment of |
346 |
| |
Assigned task of staging and mounting the operation of
Western Task Force by CTF 122 |
380 |
| ComNavEu, earmarked bases in England |
344 |
| |
Obtained basic plan for Anglo-American relations |
344 |
| |
Requested Cominch supply base maintenance organization |
345 |
| |
Organization and action |
338 |
| ComSenFor, to take over HQ and Communication established ashore
when situation warranted withdrawal of NCWTF |
579 |
| ComGen ETOUSA, charged with |
76 |
| CTG 122.4 delegated command and responsibility for area screen
by NCWTF (Capt. Harry Sanders, USS Frankford) |
428 |
| CTF 122 assigned to CTF 127 task of staging and mounting operations
of Western Task Force |
380 |
| |
CTF 127 Assigned task of staging and mounting the operation of
Western Task Force |
380 |
| |
CTF 129 25 June Adm Deyo made Com bombardment group for Cherbourg |
477 |
| |
Composition of TF 129 |
477 |
| Control vessel, used in marking beaches |
501 |
| |
Mistook Raz de la Percee for Pointe du Hoc |
542 |
| Convoy, British method of sending |
402 |
| |
American method of sending |
402 |
| |
Method of Landing |
403 |
| |
General plan for routing |
405 |
| |
General description of the convoys |
410 |
| |
"O" crossing channel |
516 |
| COPPERHEAD, description of |
148 |
| CORK Sea barrier to western channel approaches. Organized by
CinC Plymouth |
418 |
| |
Composition of forces |
418 |
| |
General disposition of forces D-day eve |
419 |
| |
No known losses to U-boats in first 2 months of operation |
421 |
| |
Brief description of |
324 |
| |
Air barrier by Coastal Command |
452 |
| CORNCOBS, briefly discussed |
326 |
| |
First convoys to sail for assault area |
392 |
| |
Diverted to Poole on postponement |
396 |
| Corry, USS, sunk by mine at UTAH 6 June |
504 |
| COSSAC, briefly described |
1 |
| |
Forming of, and selection of British officer in charge |
82 |
| |
Functions and organization |
83 |
| |
Directive ordering submission of first plan by 1 Aug |
86 |
| |
Representatives on COSSAC staff |
86 |
| |
U.S. Naval section by names |
88 |
| |
Forces available at original planning, ground, air ships |
90-93 |
| |
Survey of German disposition for defense of the French coast |
94 |
| |
Selection of assault beaches |
95 |
| |
Three conditions to be met for success of OVERLORD in 1944 |
97 |
| |
British views of Plan at QUADRANT |
98 |
| |
American views of Plan at QUADRANT |
98 |
| |
Recommendations for land command |
181 |
| |
Measures requiring immediate action if OVERLORD in May 1944 |
100 |
| |
In regards to lift |
100 |
| |
Committee gathering information on enemy radar stations |
479 |
| |
Calculations for reasonable prospect of success |
134 |
| |
Plan for keeping German forces in Normandy below set maximum |
134 |
| COTUG, Organized on 24 May dealt with NEPTUNE Tug problem |
390 |
| Cover and Deception, briefly discussed |
137-153 |
| |
Graph showing control of "Stories" |
144 |
| Covering forces for channel crossing |
319 |
| Cross Channel Operation, responsibility for planning |
21 |
| |
First plan devised by Paget, Douglas and Mountbatten |
173 |
| CRUICKSHANK, briefly described and discussed |
62 |
| Dan Buoys and their use in the invasion |
440 |
| |
Layers attached to FMS flotillas |
313 |
| d'Argenlieu, Adm, question of French command |
387 |
| Darthema, HMS, towed sub X-20 back to Portsmouth from Assault Area |
550 |
| D-day, original May date selected for three primary reasons |
273 |
| |
H-hour signaled by SCAEF on 23 May by special code |
392 |
| |
ANCXF announces force's H-hours |
393 |
| |
Basic H-hour for ETF and WTF 0645-0610 |
393 |
| |
New schedule for five H-hours |
397 |
| |
Rescheduled for June |
273 |
| |
Selection of H-hour |
274 |
| |
Tidal conditions desired by Army, Navy |
274-276 |
| |
Possible D-day and H-hour combinations |
275 |
| DD Tanks, late landing not serious |
503 |
| |
In order of landing at OMAHA |
518 |
| |
Effective firing in "S" area |
554 |
| |
Adm Hall comments on Secret weapons being no secret |
543 |
| |
Great value at SWORD and UTAH |
544 |
| |
Got quickly knocked out at OMAHA |
544 |
| |
Disposition on landing on various beaches |
544 |
| |
RAdm Talbot comments |
554 |
| Deception means employed to lead enemy to belief that
invasion was imminent |
159 |
| |
Means used to keep operations secret |
160 |
| Defense of Assault Area, briefly discussed |
320 |
| |
Forces available |
321 |
| Delivery of Army units on the Far Shore |
402 |
| Demolition Unit to hit the beaches with earliest waves |
501 |
| |
Adm Hall states 41% casualties |
520 |
| |
Casualties |
531 |
| Destroyers based and attached to Home Commands |
320 |
| DeWitt, Gen, briefly mentioned regarding FUSAG |
154 |
| Deyo, Adm, CTG 125.8 in Force "U" in Tuscaloosa |
467 |
| |
Designated CTF 129 on 25 June for bombardment of Cherbourg |
477 |
| Dill, Field Marshal Sir John, Outlined British views concerning
size of the forces which the U.S. should send to Europe |
56 |
| Diversions by navy discussed |
483 |
| DIXIE Line, briefly described |
428 |
| Doctrine for Unity of Command |
177-179 |
| |
Admiral King's view in this regard |
179 |
| |
Naval system of command |
193 |
| Douglas-Pennant, Commo, Com Force "G" |
374 |
| |
Bombardment Force "G", flag in Bulolo |
346 |
| DOWNSTREAM, briefly discussed |
152 |
| DUCK operation held 31 Dec 1943-2 Jan 1944 |
361 |
| Eastern Task Force casualties |
537 |
| EBP 1, loading and routing (1st Build-up) |
401 |
| ECT 2, loading and routing (1st Build-up British) |
401 |
| Eisenhower, Gen D.D., Directive regarding SAC |
187 |
| |
Chain of Command |
189 |
| |
Outstanding problems facing him on assumption of SAC |
190 |
| |
Commenting on Force "U" assault |
506 |
| |
Presents invasion draft to Marshall 3-12-42 |
60 |
| |
Arrives in London with Clark, Arnold, Adm Towers to discuss
BOLERO 25 May 1942 |
63 |
| |
Describes operations SLEDGEHAMMER |
70 |
| |
Reason for increase to 5 divisions for assault |
111 |
| |
View on OVERLORD |
116 |
| |
Agreements with British COS |
118 |
| |
Became ETOUSA 24 Jun 1942, Jul 1942 Supreme Allied Commander |
175 |
| |
Commenting on invasion surprise |
490 |
| |
Comments on British success at Orne and Caen area |
559 |
| |
Describes American operations |
561 |
| Eleventh Amphibious Force, establishment |
343 |
| |
Size of force upon assumption of command by Hall |
355 |
| |
Placing ships in position in force organization |
356 |
| |
Organized to meet special requirements |
359 |
| |
Forces in Eleventh Amphibs |
363 |
| |
Force Responsibilities |
207 |
| Enemy reactions to assault forces |
382-383 |
| |
Reasons for failure of more effective reaction |
383 |
| ENTHRONE Operations for laying sonic under water buoys |
439 |
| Escort Force for convoys |
432 |
| EUREKA Conference military conclusions |
46 |
| |
Three courses of action for future developments |
47 |
| |
Three pre-eminent facts in the European military situation |
47 |
| Exercises for amphibious training |
360 |
| |
Experiments and trails made during exercises |
361 |
| FABIUS last full scale rehearsals before NEPTUNE 3-6 May |
365 |
| |
Adm Hall executes force "O" under FABIUS |
366 |
| Far Shore establishment in three phases |
566 |
| |
As soon as beaches secure control goes to FOBAA and FOWEST |
566 |
| |
Basic tasks during three phases |
567 |
| |
Development charged to Task Force Commander |
567 |
| |
British Area |
567-570 |
| |
American Area |
570-572 |
| Ferry forces composing ferry phase of Build-up operations |
312 |
| |
Control, briefly described |
576 |
| |
Officers responsible for control of crews |
579 |
| |
Temporary disablement of 70% by near disastrous storm |
573 |
| Fifteenth Army defense area |
233 |
| Fighter protection for NEPTUNE forces |
455 |
| |
During the crossing and assault |
324 |
| First Army composition |
233,
359 |
| |
Locations for formations in England |
360 |
| Follow-up forces loading and assembly |
305 |
| |
Program of assault |
308 |
| |
Approach and time table |
308 |
| FOBAA (Rear Adm J.W. Rivett-Carmac), responsibilities of |
568 |
| Force "B" follow up loading and routing |
401 |
| |
"G" composition |
270,
546 |
| |
Loading and routing |
400 |
| |
Commanded by Commo Douglas-Pennant |
374 |
| |
Brief discussion on training period |
374 |
| Force "J" composition |
548 |
| |
Loading and routing of convoy |
400 |
| |
Error in movement along route |
407 |
| |
Brief description of its content |
270 |
| |
Brief history of Force "J" |
372 |
| |
Capt Hughes-Hallett commanding |
372 |
| |
Adm Vian Commanding, Nov 43 |
372 |
| |
Commo Oliver relieves Vian |
372 |
| |
Loaded and routed via |
400 |
| Force "L" loading and routing |
401 |
| Force "O" loading and routing |
400 |
| |
Tail of convoy O.2 drifts from route in crossing |
408 |
| Force "V" |
153 |
| Force "U" loading and routing |
400 |
| |
Tail of convoy U.2 drifts from route in crossing |
405 |
| |
Lands between 1,000 and 1,500 yards south of intended point |
409 |
| |
Primary and secondary control vessels became casualties |
409 |
| FORTITUDE, briefly discussed |
146,
151 |
| FORTITUDE NORTH, briefly discussed |
147 |
| FORTITUDE SOUTH, briefly discussed |
147 |
| FOX operation by amphibs in which APAs were first used |
364 |
| Free French landed in assault with Commandoes |
556 |
| French ships to be used in invasion |
387 |
| FUSAG under command of Eisenhower |
157 |
| |
Mythical force |
159 |
| Gerhardt, Maj Gen commander of 29th Inf Div of 5th Army |
362 |
| German Air Forces, affected after Italian surrender |
27 |
| |
Forces available for air operations against NEPTUNE |
454 |
| |
Reaction to the landing |
457 |
| |
Brief compilation of air available |
250 |
| |
Estimated maximum scale |
251 |
| |
Defenses consisted of tunnels, etc. at OMAHA |
523 |
| |
Defense plan, briefly discussed |
234 |
| |
System of coast defenses based on three principles |
253 |
| |
Allied plan to overcome German defense system |
253 |
| |
Gridded batteries |
458 |
| |
Fighter forces required for invasion in Caen area |
128 |
| |
Necessary air situation prior to assault |
129 |
| |
Reduction of fighter forces by bomber offensive |
130-132 |
| |
Fleet, briefly discussed |
154 |
| |
Fleet stationed in Norwegian waters |
416 |
| |
Reasons for fleet inactivity |
417 |
| |
Estimated forces in Biscay area |
418 |
| |
Operations by German destroyers 6-9 June |
420 |
| |
COSSAC survey of disposition of forces for defense of French coast |
94 |
| |
Effect of a strong Italian campaign on forces |
44 |
| |
Relative strength in 1944, reasons for opinion |
80 |
| |
List of major naval vessels |
246 |
| |
ANCXF appraisal of enemy vessels |
246 |
| |
Disposition between Bight and Bay of Biscay |
248 |
| |
Forces available to attack NEPTUNE |
410 |
| |
Allied naval plan to defend against enemy threat |
411 |
| |
Forces disposed in southern reaches of the North Sea |
421 |
| |
Extent of activity in Dover Straits |
422 |
| |
Forces within Channel |
422 |
| |
Plans for U-boat employment |
451 |
| |
Destroyers trying to attack invasion forces |
453 |
| |
Naval losses on D-day |
563 |
| |
Strength of Axis fleets |
38 |
| |
Troop dispositions |
243 |
| |
Four general types of coastal divisions |
244 |
| |
Troops replacing Italians in event of surrender |
27 |
| Ghormley, VAdm R.L., Special Naval Observer |
338 |
| |
Designated ComNavEu 17 Mar 1942 |
339 |
| Group U.2.A ordered back on postponement |
499,
396 |
| Germany, predominant Axis power, declaration of |
1 |
| Glennon, USS, struck a mine and sank 8 June 1944 |
443,
504 |
| GLIMMER, briefly described |
147 |
| |
Composition |
319 |
| |
Under responsibility of VAdm Dover |
483 |
| GOOSEBERRIES, brief description |
326 |
| GRAFFHAM, briefly described |
147 |
| Group "J" composition |
548 |
| Group "S" composition |
554 |
| HADRIAN, briefly discussed |
62 |
| Haida, HMS, engaged with HMS Hurron in operation GLIMMER |
484 |
| Hall, RAdm J.L. Com11th Fleet |
343 |
| |
Duty prior to 11th Fleet assignment |
343 |
| |
Size of force upon assuming command |
355 |
| |
Executes operation FABIUS Force "O" |
360 |
| |
Commenting on beach obstacles |
491 |
| |
Presented to the King of England |
391 |
| |
Comments on DD tanks |
543 |
| |
Describes the OMAHA assault |
507 |
| |
Commenting on transport area |
517 |
| |
Commenting in regards to obstacles |
519 |
| |
Commenting on landing |
532 |
| |
Telephone conversation regarding postponement |
500 |
| Hards, description of |
352 |
| |
Specially constructed in several ports |
352 |
| H-hour tidal conditions needed by Army and Navy |
274-276 |
| |
Possible D-day and H-hour combinations |
275 |
| |
Benefits of the selected H-hour |
282 |
| Home fleet forces assigned to protection of NEPTUNE forces |
416 |
| Hopkins, Mr. Harry accompanied Marshall to England with plan |
60 |
| Hot Bunk System used in accommodating crews of landing craft |
579 |
| Housing for personnel ashore in England |
350 |
| Hurd Deep, briefly discussed |
419 |
| Hurron, HMS, along with HMS Haida engaged in operation GLIMMER |
484 |
| Human Torpedoes used in July |
427 |
| Huse, Commander J.O., PhibsEu |
340 |
|
| Maintenance, list of units responsible under Comlandcrabeu |
367 |
| |
Work accomplished on various craft |
364 |
| |
Salvage units operating in U.S. sector |
330 |
| MAPLE, briefly described |
412 |
| |
Forces involved |
412 |
| |
6,850 mines laid during operation and location |
415 |
| |
MTB-203 sunk in operation and casualties |
415 |
| Marshall, Gen, opinion of British general policy in Mediterranean and N. Africa |
17 |
| |
Views on Washington Conference |
64 |
| |
Allied operations in European theater |
23 |
| |
Visit to England, 1942 |
11 |
| |
Oppositions regarding future operations |
22 |
| |
Agrees on Ike's invasion plan, goes with Hopkins to England |
60 |
| |
Describes results of Conference in London in 1942 |
62 |
| |
Recommendation on OVERLORD and ANVIL |
113 |
| |
Feelings in regards to ANVIL and OVERLORD |
113 |
| |
American Planning Staff added to Combined Com Staff |
174 |
| |
Asks for U.S. SAC at Quebec Conference |
182 |
| |
Views on overall SAC with subordinate SAC Med, SAC OVERLORD |
183 |
| |
British view on his SAC proposal |
184 |
| Maynard, Capt, Commander of APAs of Force "U" |
364 |
| McNair, Gen, briefly mentioned in connection with FUSAG |
159 |
| Mediterranean operations being considered, forwarded to Stalin by Roosevelt |
42 |
| |
British COS view in regards to operation in Mediterranean |
31 |
| |
British view that action should be directed in 1943 |
27 |
| |
British COS views regarding Allied possession of Africa |
15 |
| Merchant service in Build-up operations |
311 |
| |
Forces composing Merchant phase of Build-up |
311 |
| |
Shipping and losses shown in table by periods |
38 |
| |
Progress of BOLERO shipping shown in table form |
77 |
| Meredith, USS, struck a mine and sank 8 June |
443,
509 |
| Messing facilities for landing craft crews, shore parties |
580 |
| MESSPOT, briefly described |
151 |
| Military forces deployed by U.S. in two theatres |
9 |
| Minelaying object |
322 |
| |
Forces taking part |
322 |
| |
Operation |
323 |
| |
By aircraft |
325 |
| |
By Germans prior to D-day |
383 |
| |
First steps of operation CORK |
419 |
| |
Operation MAPLE |
412 |
| |
Forces employed in operation MAPLE |
412 |
| |
More objects of minelaying |
413 |
| |
BRAVADO was for Kiel and approaches |
413 |
| |
Six phases of minelaying plan up to and beyond D-day |
413 |
| |
Enemy's minelaying counter-attack |
443 |
| |
Ships sunk by mines |
443 |
| |
Enemy's use of unsweepable mines |
443 |
| |
Number and location of mines laid in MAPLE |
415 |
| |
Enemy mine situation within NEPTUNE waters |
433 |
| |
Five general steps for dealing with mines in NEPTUNE area |
434 |
| Mines used in German defense |
238 |
| |
Unsweepable mines, briefly described |
443 |
| |
Steps taken to counter unsweepable mines |
443 |
| |
Ships lost to and enemy mines accounted for |
446 |
| |
Greatest enemy of Force "U": |
504 |
| Minesweeping, dealt with in five general steps in NEPTUNE |
434 |
| |
Home CinCs responsible for minesweeping |
435 |
| |
Arrangements in assault area |
435 |
| |
ANCXF retained direct control in the initial ten channels |
435 |
| |
Total strength of Allied minesweepers engaged in assault |
436 |
| |
Briefly, the activity of sweepers during operation approach |
439 |
| |
Tasks after sweeping channels and areas |
441 |
| |
Inshore waters |
442 |
| |
Operations at Cherbourg |
444 |
| Montgomery, Gen Sir Bernard L, Revision of OVERLORD Plan |
108 |
| |
U.S. point of view of net effects of this change |
108 |
| Moon, RAdm Don P, designated to command new force |
362 |
| |
Adm at end of Jan 1944 |
363 |
| |
Approximate number of ships under his command |
494 |
| |
Telephone conversation with Adm Hall re postponement |
500 |
| |
Commenting on enemy gunfire |
504 |
| |
Trouble with acoustic mines |
505 |
| Mooring facilities had to be prepared at following ports |
353 |
| Morale failing in Germany |
127 |
| |
Discussed in report of JIC of 18 May 1944 |
131 |
| Morgan, Lt Gen Frederick E, Plans for Cross Channel Attack |
52 |
| |
Initial work on ROUNDUP |
52 |
| |
Reasons for selection as head of COSSAC |
82 |
| Mountbatten, Lord Louis, consulted on Cross Channel Attack Plans |
52 |
| |
Assisted in devising first plan with Paget and Douglas |
173 |
| MOVCO, briefly discussed |
313,
232 |
| |
Responsibility of USA and USN under |
376 |
| MTB-203 sunk night of 18/19 May in MAPLE operation |
415 |
| MULBERRIES, description |
326,
328 |
| |
First mentioned |
231 |
| |
Difference between A and B type |
327 |
| |
Difficulty encountered after construction faulty rigging |
387 |
| |
Parking problems |
390 |
| |
Tug shortages |
390 |
| Murdaugh Monarch (HMS Cable Layer) fired on by Plunkett 13 June |
430 |
| MUSKRAT, briefly described |
364 |
| Naval Bases and training areas selected early by ComNavEu |
344 |
| Naval Bombardment objectives |
464 |
| |
Composition of forces |
464 |
| |
Final allocation of ships |
466 |
| |
Results of bombardment |
474 |
| |
Excerpt from German military Journal |
475 |
| |
Bombardment of Cherbourg |
478 |
| |
Bombardment of enemy radar stations and networks |
480 |
| Naval Forces, AEF, taking part in NEPTUNE |
291-293 |
| Naval Operational command chain diagramed |
218 |
| |
After assault phase |
220 |
| |
Chronology of various steps in the evolution of OVERLORD Naval Command |
222 |
| Navigation system for location swept channels |
405 |
| |
Electronic navigational aids employed QH and QM |
406 |
| |
Deviations in error along routes |
406 |
| |
MLs designated navigational leaders |
408 |
| |
Aids for locating channels |
439 |
| |
PCs and SCs used as markers by US forces, MLs and DDs by British |
409 |
| Naval Combat Demolition Units, briefly discussed |
271 |
| NCWTF Recommendations to ANCXF D-day bombardment of Cherbourg |
382 |
| |
Doesn't accept Air Force routing plan over beaches |
389 |
| NEPTUNE, description of |
1 |
| |
Objective |
301 |
| |
Naval object |
301 |
| |
Broad Plan of Attack |
301 |
| |
Command |
302 |
| |
Forces taking part |
303 |
| |
D-day, H-hour |
303 |
| |
Loading and assembly of forces for follow-up |
305 |
| |
Attached forces |
306 |
| |
Merchant vessels |
307 |
| |
Reasons for success |
487 |
| |
General scheme of movements briefly discussed |
400 |
| |
Losses by U-boat |
421 |
| Nineteenth Army located in Mediterranean and Italian front |
233 |
| Nitro, USS, Ammunition carrier |
473 |
| Obstacles, submerged and dry responsibility divided USA and USN |
231 |
| |
Subjected to drenching fire |
469 |
| |
Adm Hall commenting on |
491 |
| |
OMAHA obstacles more numerous than intelligence reported |
511 |
| |
Encountered in "S" area |
555 |
| |
Craft driven at full speed through these waters |
555 |
| |
Adm Hall commenting on, in OMAHA area |
519 |
| Oliver, Commo G.N., Commanding Force "J" |
372 |
| OMAHA, Assault on Beach |
518 |
| |
Air bombardment failed to materialize |
518 |
| |
Considered landing part of Force "O" through "G" beaches |
522 |
| |
Enemy use of tunnels |
523 |
| |
Channel crossing |
507 |
| |
Described by Adm Hall |
507 |
| |
Major units of assault |
508 |
| |
Plan for assault |
511 |
| |
Bombardment force "C" |
513 |
| |
Assembled at five ports |
514 |
| Orders defined, (Op-Orders, ON_ONAD_ONCO) |
384 |
| |
Methods of writing employed by ANCXF |
385 |
| |
Freeze put on altering orders |
386 |
| Osprey, USS, First casualty of operation |
438 |
| OVERLORD, briefly described |
1 |
| |
Start of actual operation |
7 |
| |
Termination of operation |
7 |
| |
First decision to launch |
33 |
| |
President and PM had three decisions in regards to OVERLORD |
44 |
| |
Finally approved |
30 |
| |
EUREKA decision to launch during May 1944 |
47 |
| |
COSSAC agrees provided conditions met |
97 |
| |
Adm King allots necessary lift for five division assault |
119 |
| PARADISE, briefly described |
148 |
| Paratroop reinforcements in British sector |
557 |
| Passage, as defined for this operation |
437 |
| |
Troubles of the minesweepers |
440 |
| Patrols for Operation CORK |
420 |
| |
Along convoy lanes |
422 |
| |
Disposed in Channel |
423 |
| |
System of defense in Eastern and Western Areas |
426,
428 |
| Patton, Gen George S., briefly mentioned |
159 |
| PC-1176 as Control Vessel |
502 |
| PC-1261 struck mine in Cardonet minefield |
501 |
| Personnel, responsibility for loading between USA and USN |
377 |
| PHOENIX, brief description |
326 |
| Plunkett fires on HMS Murdaugh Monarch |
430 |
| PLUTO, briefly described |
329 |
| POINTBLANK Air bombardment of Seine Bay |
462 |
| Port defense by Germans |
240 |
| Postponement of D-day |
276 |
| Preparatory phase of landing |
281 |
| Pre-War Policy, unilateral statement of |
4 |
| Provisional Engineer Special Brigade, overall command of Shore Party |
571 |
| |
One brigade supported each division, one naval beach battalion to each brigade |
574 |
| |
Joint conferences |
575 |
| Radar stations in chain along English Channel |
423 |
| |
Counter-measures to prevent Germans locating Allied vessels |
468,
479 |
| |
German radar capabilities |
479 |
| |
Naval responsibilities in regards to destroying German radar |
479 |
| Radio deceptive methods |
162 |
| RCM Plan, Joint Army-Navy, evolved in 1943 |
479 |
| Ramsay, VAdm Sir Bertram, consulted in Cross Channel Plans |
52 |
| |
Reasons for selection as ANCXF |
211 |
| |
Estimate of reaction to NEPTUNE |
249 |
| |
Commenting on reasons for success of Operation NEPTUNE |
487 |
| |
Description of effect of surprise |
488 |
| |
Commenting on needs of a shallow draft tug for clearing beaches |
556 |
| |
Summarized events of D-day |
562 |
| |
Agreed to restict naval AA fire with certain provisions |
388 |
| |
In regards to Tug shortage |
390 |
| |
Decision in regards to D-day and H-hour |
392 |
| |
Assumed operational control of forces, 1200 1 June |
394 |
| |
Summarizes situation on eve of 4 June |
397 |
| |
Comments on lowering positions |
516 |
| |
Commenting generally on use of Rangers |
528 |
| Rangers, capture Isles de St. Marcouf |
502 |
| |
Landings on OMAHA |
512 |
| |
Attacking Pointe du Hoc |
526 |
| |
Late in hitting target of Pointe du Hoc |
526 |
| |
Admy Ramsay comments -- More Rangers and Comandoes than targets |
528 |
| RANKIN, briefly discussed, also cases A-B-C |
83-84 |
| Recovery and Repair of equipment and vessels |
581-582 |
| Responsibililty between Army and Navy (Kirk-Bradley Agreement) |
230 |
| Results of cover and deceptive operations |
166-169 |
| Rich, USS, struck and sunk by a mine 8 June |
443,
504 |
| Rivett-Carmac, RAdm, Chief Naval Administrative Officer |
565 |
| |
Developed organization for Far Shore |
567 |
| |
FOBAA |
568 |
| Rockets used by enemy |
524 |
| ROUNDUP, central concept provides for two phases |
65 |
| |
General outline of plan |
67 |
| |
Brief discussion |
63 |
| |
Full-scale invasion of France in 1943, planned in May 1942 |
62 |
| |
Provisional assessment of Naval Implications of ROUNDUP |
193 |
| Routing Plan, in general for NEPTUNE |
405 |
| |
Mistakes along channels to beaches |
406 |
| ROYAL FLUSH, briefly described |
148 |
| Royal Navy preparations |
371 |
| SAC, reason for appointing American commander |
175 |
| |
General Marshall asks for US SAC at Quebec Conference |
182 |
| |
Views on overall SAC with subordinate SAC MED, SAC OVERLORD, etc. |
183 |
| |
British views |
184 |
| |
Chain of Command |
189 |
| Saunders, Capt, delegated as CTF 122.4 |
428 |
| Salvage, maintenance and repair briefly described |
577,
578 |
| Saterlee, USS, comment on Rangers need for gunfire at Ponte du Hoc |
526 |
| SCAEF, signalled decision for D-day on 23 May by special code |
392 |
| |
Decided to postpone operation |
395 |
| |
Proceeds with operation on 6 June |
397 |
| Schnorkel-type subs used during invasion |
452 |
| Screening, assigned to force commanders |
425 |
| |
Home commands screened convoys, force commanders areas |
425 |
| |
Forces employed for screening by WTF |
428 |
| |
System of Defense in Eastern and Western Area |
426-428 |
| Scylla, HMS, flagship of Adm Vian |
541 |
| Security methods employed |
386 |
| |
Crossword puzzle |
387 |
| Seventh Army responsible for Western Channel and Brittany coast |
233 |
| Shipping (British), major uses of British shipping |
73 |
| |
Moving U.S. requirements |
74 |
| Ships, position in force organization |
356 |
| |
Hit in bombardment of Cherbourg |
478 |
| |
Sunk in Force "U" |
505 |
| |
Sunk in Force "O" |
530 |
| |
Sunk in Eastern Task Force |
537 |
| Shore Fire Control Parties, description, techniques, etc. |
470 |
| Shore Parties, in U.S. area |
571 |
| |
Joint Conferences |
575 |
| Ships allocated for bombardment |
318 |
| |
Major units of Force "U" |
494 |
| Shuttle forces of the Build-up operation |
311 |
| |
CCS agreement to bombing |
126 |
| |
Control briefly discussed |
581 |
| Sicily would save two million tons of shipping a year |
27 |
| SICKLE, description, Gen Eaker's plan |
124 |
| Signal stations operating in JUNO sector early |
552 |
| SKYE, brief description |
147 |
| Slapton Sands, approved base for American exercises |
351 |
| |
Exercises held |
364 |
| SLEDGEHAMMER, described |
13,
14,
61 |
| |
As Eisenhower describes it |
70 |
| Slips had to be built at ports to increase facilities |
354 |
| SPENAVO defined |
338 |
| Spotting for bombardment forces |
317 |
| |
Transport for Army spotting planes |
389 |
| |
Types of spotting used |
469 |
| SPOUT, brief description and location |
410 |
| Staging and Mounting task assigned to CTF 127 by CTF 122 |
380 |
| Stalin expresses views at Moscow |
42-43 |
| Stark, Adm, questioned Dill about size of US force needed in England |
56 |
| |
Informs Cominch of British support for AEF |
345 |
| STARKIE described |
136 |
| Strategic objectives of the Soviets |
41 |
| St. Marcouf captured by Rangers |
502 |
| Submarines used by British in Invasion |
395,
96,
408,
542,
550 |
| Sullivan, Commo, Salvage Organization at Cherbourg |
446 |
| Sunk by mines, etc. |
443 |
| Supporting Air Operations, forces available |
323 |
| |
Naval Operations, number of ships and craft in the Build-up |
313 |
| Svenner, H.Nor, M.S., sunk in SWORD area |
553 |
| SWORD Beach marked by submarines |
408 |
| Talbot, RAdm A.G., Com Force "S", flag in HMS Largs |
557 |
| |
Comments on DD tanks |
554 |
| |
Lands to see how assault landing progresses |
557 |
| |
Comments on torpedo attack |
537,
540 |
| Target priorities fixed 6 May 1943 |
131 |
| |
Bombardment |
469 |
| Task Force 122, Adm Kirk's establishment of this force |
204 |
| |
Reports as U.S. Naval Task Force Commander |
212 |
| |
Disolved and reverted to Com12thFlt |
225 |
| TAXABLE described |
147 |
| |
Composition of forces |
319 |
| |
Under responsibility of VAdm Dover |
484 |
| Texas, USS, comment on Rangers need for gunfire on Pointe du Hoc |
526 |
| Task Group 124.9, Bombardment Group of Force "O" |
467 |
| Task Group 125.8, Bombardment Group of Force "U" |
467 |
| Tide, USS, sunk by mine at UTAH |
443,
504 |
| TIGER, Force "U" operation |
365 |
| |
E-boats attack during operation |
365 |
| TINDEL described |
136 |
| TITANIC described (4 phases) |
147 |
| TORCH, opposed invasion |
62 |
| |
Decision to launch made in November 1942 |
39 |
| Torpedo attack on Force "S" |
537 |
| TORRENT, described |
135 |
| Training deceptions in connection with FORTITUDE |
157 |
| Transport methods for build up of assault |
311 |
| |
Brief description of Ferry Control |
576 |
| TROUTFLY, briefly described |
148 |
| Tug problem in connection with MULBERRIES |
390 |
| |
COTUG organized to deal with problems |
390 |
| TURCO explained |
580,
312.
232 |
| Turkey, effect of entry upon Germany in war |
45 |
| |
EUREKA view on bringing into war |
47 |
| Twelfth Fleet assigned 11th Amphib Force in toto |
203 |
| |
Organizing Task Force 122 |
207 |
| |
Duties |
207 |
| |
Responsible for TF 122 |
341 |
| |
Assignment of vessels to force organization |
356 |